As I mentioned in my previous post, I am currently working on some original research dealing with Social Engineering. For background, I have been reading some of the few books on social engineering. One of them, Hacking the Human, by Ian Mann, has been fantastic. One of the areas of research he goes into is some basic principles on using Neuro-Lingustic Programming to profile a target.
Neuro-Lingustic Programming (NLP) was first developed by Richard Bandler and John Grinder, as a form of psychological therapy. They felt there was a “…theoretical connection between neurological processes (‘neuro’), language (‘linguistic’), and behavioral patterns that have been learned through experience (‘programming’), and that can be organised to achieve specific goals in life.” (Wikipedia)
One aspect of NLP that Mann brought out was the idea of observing eye movements to indicate current thought processes. For example, the idea that as one talks to themselves, their eyes drift bottom-right.
The following is a diagram of the different possible locations:
I found a great video that showcases this.
(Used with Permission)
I found this to be a very interesting concept–So I decided to test it out for myself. I asked the same questions as the above video to a friend, while videoing him answering. Interestingly, I got the same results, though not quite as pronounced as the above video.
To bring this back to Social Engineering: Mann saw this as a powerful tool to add to his repertoire for face to face social engineering attacks–being able to get clues to the current thought process of the target–even being able to tell, with a high percentage of accuracy, if the target is lying! (Mann, Hacking the Human)
Just another exploitable vulnerability in the being that is the called the Human.
1 thought on “Social Engineering & Neuro-Lingustic Programming (NLP) Profiling”
I also find NLP to be very interesting stuff.
Not only is a powerful discipline to read others, but also to better understand how you occur to others so you can become more effective in communications in terms of both the body language and verbal.